CCL braces
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:55 am
Hi,
We have 2 cases at our veterinary clinic where the clients are interested in braces but 2 vets have differing opinions on it being a good idea or not. I told them I would get your wise advice to help them decide
1st case - owner had opted for MMP procedure at out clinic (we are not specialists and offer this type of repair as mid range - better than a lateral fabella but not as good as TTA at a specialist which is more costly as well as involving travel. The client had been researching and wants a cast moulding made so they can have a brace fabricated and shipped to NZ. The brace is to support the contralateral limb during recovery. So my first question was - if they can afford the brace, why not just get a TTA as in my opinion the recovery is much faster and thus less strain on the contralateral limb. Apparently they think the dog may have an immune disorder that caused degeneration of the CCL and possibility (isnt there always) of rupturing.
I know the companies market the braces for the use of supporting the contralateral limb, do you ever do this? Beneficial during rehab process while mm is restored?
2nd case - dog 3 years ago had CCL rupture repaired at a different veterinary clinic using lateral fabella method. Now NWBL and instability of the stifle confirmed. Owner is not wanting to do surgery again and is requesting brace. However, how successful is this likely to be now with old scar tissue? I questioned meniscus being already removed in the last surgery or not but the vet will have to try and find this out from the other clinic.
Both dogs are large breeds
Any thoughts would be appreciated
Thank you
We have 2 cases at our veterinary clinic where the clients are interested in braces but 2 vets have differing opinions on it being a good idea or not. I told them I would get your wise advice to help them decide

1st case - owner had opted for MMP procedure at out clinic (we are not specialists and offer this type of repair as mid range - better than a lateral fabella but not as good as TTA at a specialist which is more costly as well as involving travel. The client had been researching and wants a cast moulding made so they can have a brace fabricated and shipped to NZ. The brace is to support the contralateral limb during recovery. So my first question was - if they can afford the brace, why not just get a TTA as in my opinion the recovery is much faster and thus less strain on the contralateral limb. Apparently they think the dog may have an immune disorder that caused degeneration of the CCL and possibility (isnt there always) of rupturing.
I know the companies market the braces for the use of supporting the contralateral limb, do you ever do this? Beneficial during rehab process while mm is restored?
2nd case - dog 3 years ago had CCL rupture repaired at a different veterinary clinic using lateral fabella method. Now NWBL and instability of the stifle confirmed. Owner is not wanting to do surgery again and is requesting brace. However, how successful is this likely to be now with old scar tissue? I questioned meniscus being already removed in the last surgery or not but the vet will have to try and find this out from the other clinic.
Both dogs are large breeds
Any thoughts would be appreciated
Thank you